|
Sociorhetorical Interpretation Emory Studies in Early Christianity |
![]() |
|
|
|
Historical-critical discourseSocio-Rhetorical Examples Definition of historical discourse. Let us look at an example of narrative analysis which is ideologically aligned with historical-critical interpretation. Here the discourse adopts the mode of accurate historiography which yields theological insight into God's activity in the world. It is fair to say that this kind of discourse currently dominates most commentaries on New Testament texts.
In his own words, Matera's account does not try to present a historical study, "that is, it does not try to reconstruct the historical events which actually occurred" (Matera 1986: 5). The goal "is to study each passion narrative in terms of the particular evangelist's theology" (Matera 1986: 6). Since the discourse is sound and sober "narrative" theology, however, the ideological texture of the commentary evokes a certainty that the reader is getting a basically accurate insight into the history of first century Christianity. Only if the theology were radical or excessive would the history be unreliable. Or to put it another way, the discourse evokes a conviction that there is really no better insight into this history than these texts that were chosen by reputable early Christians to represent the story of who they are. As indicated above, this mode of discourse represents dominant culture rhetoric in the field of biblical studies today. But there are also modes of discourse with significantly different ideological alliances. From V. K. Robbins, Exploring the Texture of Texts, (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International, 1996), pp. 106-7. Back to ideological texture index Textures Index | Text Index | Discourse Index | Oppositional Rhetoric Index Back to Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation Homepage |
|
|
Pages maintained by Vernon K. Robbins. Copyright © Emory University. |
||